The style of raising the queries matches with a global trend. In the current scenario, if a citizen of Tanzania, Uganda, Vietnam, China, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, questions their own government's decision / any policy /rule they fall into severe trouble. Even in the cases of democratic governments constructive or objective criticism is often taken as an offense. Questioning the government or higher authorities for clarification or understanding in a dignified way must be allowed. Unfortunately, people are harassed for both being rude and polite for asking questions. The democratic system must be broad minded to tolerate constructive and objective criticism. On the other hand, the opposition must have a balanced approach. And without this mentality the system loses its own importance. While criticizing one must place their own vision related to the topic and be prepared for counter queries raised by the ruling party or the head who was asked to give clarification. It is a two way traffic where both parties must have a healthy approach towards the functioning of the government. Globally, this trend is reversed in a horrible way where not only the opposition is losing its own credibility but legislature, judiciary and executive are moving away from the purpose for which they were formed.
In the same way charvaka philosophy raised queries in ways. Instead of analyzing and replying, all the scholars of other 8 schools opposed, defamed for the sake of their own and sponsor's interest. The sampradayas emerging during the mediaeval era followed the trend. In short but brief this issue will be analyzed.
As usual, the majority of the Indian monarchy also worked on controlling and brainwashing the mass. New scriptures were written and interpretations were done to suit the needs of the sponsors who were either directly rulers or supported by them. The scholars were mostly related with this or that ruler so they were more interested in keeping their respective rulers happy. On the other hand, the sampradayas received grants from the rulers so they promoted the vision of controlling the society. It became a joint venture and the veda was promoted as authoritative in nature.
The root of the word veda is 'vid' - according to the Dhatuparh the meanings and their translations are shown in the shared image. They need further clarification:-
1 to know - Information which becomes knowledge after study, reasoning and experience via various mediums. Self experimentation with every information is not essential. At least, one must have the right information and in the case of confusion, contradiction, chaos regarding any information right of analysing and asking is supported by our ancient wisdom which never compels anyone to accept, follow every conclusion and advice With closed eyes of wisdom. If anyone is unable to do so, can take the guidance of an experienced guide related with the matter of confusion. Knowing leads to understanding, helps in learning and meditating on the words (nidhidhyasan). So the first two steps are Shravan (listening) and Manan (deep thinking). Deep thinking or analysis leads to contemplation and meditation as the final step. These two combindingly is known as nididhyasana.
Our ancient wisdom supports the concept of knowing, cognition, bewareness, awareness, analytical experience and not simply believing, feeling in the name of faith and faulty upbringing. Even divine and spiritualistic experience are subjected for analyses because quite often they are the result of preoccupied notions.
2 This meaning is only related to the awareness of one's own existence without attributes and superimposed identities. Normally, everyone is more familiar with them. If the meaning is taken as power, it will be a blunder and totally mislead everyone. On the other hand, the meanings must match with each other and here, existence can be known through meditation.
3 Gain, obtain, receive. Knowing the difference between one's own true and attributed nature (identity) is the ultimate gain. It helps in maintaining a balanced approach between behaviour and spiritualism. After all, till body is there behaviour will go on with one's own body and external world. The external world stays in STM, LTM and physically in various forms. This 'gaun' is possible through knowing.
4 in depth or analytical analysis. Here, only reasoning is not supported which can be illicit. One of the formulas given by the rishis of Vedic age is shruti(study), yukti (reasoning), anubhuti(experience) via various mediums. Accepting one or two must be avoided and the word 'shruti' must not be limited to any scripture and hymns. Here, it denotes studying the available literature of a particular stream (topic) and beware of the latest research done on that. With this the required sadhana is essential to know and reach the conclusion.
5 to look after the body which is the residence of pure consciousness. It is all prevailing but easily felt via forms. In the case of rocks, walls, furniture etc there is no antahkaran (अंतःकरण) conscience that is why they do not act - react.
There are two views regarding the human body - temple and a bag of filthy things. All depend on the person. In yoga vasistha it is taken as a temple (deho-devalaya), 1 Corinthians 6:19- 20 (New Testament). Through this the message of looking after one's own body in a disciplined way, following morality and respecting others' bodies is given. Now, looking after one's own body must be followed properly. Disciplined lifestyle is supported by this meaning.
After going through all the five meanings of the root 'vid' it is clear that veda is not a book and authoritative in nature. None of the meanings take veda as a book whose support or opposition will prove anyone as astika - nastika. Just by publishing in the form of a book without even adding the authentic upanishads one is insulting veda. On the one hand the supporters take veda as God, shruti as the divine mother but will not give them freedom to make decisions on the style of preaching. In other words they have to dress according to the desire of their children.
The above-mentioned meanings are also linked with each other and give their full support to charvaka, Jain and Bauddha darshanas. Now, the charvaka school will be analyzed in the light of these five meanings.
Our basic or natural nature is to remain happy. Every human being loves happiness and works to achieve that. The forms and ways of obtaining happiness / pleasure differ from person to person and even change for the same person according to the circumstances. The concept of happiness remains as it is. The school in discussion talks about a happy span of life. There can not be one parameter / scale of calculating and defining happiness for any individual. So from the behavoral angle one must have every possible information about the subject (happy) concerned. Even in the path of spiritual journey the level and grasping capacity differs from person to person. On the other hand there are numerous misleading paths in both behaviour and spiritualism. So, a seeker must have the knowledge of path as needed in the field of transactional reality / behaviour.
The second meaning talks about the identity of an individual. Most people forget about themselves by being immersed in behavior. Inability to analyze their own true nature and that also without attributes can be checked when one gets the information about that. This school have added the concept of death with the happy span of life. It compels us to think about the time which we have only for ourselves and use to become introverts. It leads to contented lifestyle which is the requited gain mentioned in the third meaning. After all, worldly affairs and rat race must not be our goal. That is why, this school favours the vision of a balanced approach between behavior and spiritualism.
The factor of gain as the third meaning resembles the removal of ignorance, misunderstanding, disinformation coming in daily life in ways. Technically, the word 'avidya' is also used for the seekers.
This school talks about self control for the total span of life. Controlled consumption of goods and services is the foundation. The concept of control comes with knowing the true nature of the self and the world. And this level is achieved by fasting, contemplation and meditation. The person not only believes but knows. As we all know that the vision of fasting is established in Jain darshan and meditation in Bauddha darshan. This school asks people to get and apply the vision helpful for the happy span of life and receiving that vision is the gain.
The fourth meaning shows the importance of our scriptures by asking everyone to use the vivek (discretion, judgment, virtue, discrimination or differentiation, wisdom) while accepting their teachings. None of them forces them to believe and indirectly opens the path of knowing / being aware. This school keeps the doors open to analyze one's own lifestyle.
The fifth meaning openly talks about the body level. When a body is looked after or cared as one looks after a place of worship it stays mentally - intellectually healthy and happy if not physically everytime. When any particular human body is not treated as a temple it becomes a burden and nuisance. Charvaka school opposes this because it will never result in the happy span of life nor give lasting happiness /pleasure. Uncontrolled pleasure is not the aim of this school.
Therefore, all the five meanings are tuned with this school and there is no doubt in declaring that charvaka darshana is totally vedic. What about Jain and Bauddha? They are also totally vaidic. We have the concept of Asti and not nasti. The book is here and the book is not here. In both the cases the knower is present. This is the first meaning followed by others in full support.
Well crafted plot of defamers took the help of the verse 11 of Manusmriti, chapter 2 -
योऽवमन्येत ते मूले हेतुशास्त्राश्रयाद् द्विजः ।
स साधुभिर्बहिष्कार्यो नास्तिको वेदनिन्दकः॥ ११ ॥
yo̕vamanyet te mule hetushastrashrayad dvijah .
sa sadhubhirbahishkaryo nastiko vedanindakah ।।11।।
Good people (sadhus) should shun that person who criticizes the religion propounded / predicated by the scriptures (veda) because that person is an atheist.
Both cultured and uncultured people were included among the detractors, that is, the cultured people will believe everything out of fear. There was no hesitation in calling the veda critic an atheist and considering it (veda) as just a book. Even the followers of Sanskrit grammar never analyzed the meaning of the word veda. All of us talk about shabd pramana and not book pramana. The rishis of Vedic age gave the formulas to judge the authenticity of any scripture or commentary or any other form of presentation. When the vedic literature gives the right to judge the contents there is nothing to fear. This right has been supported by Acharya Madhusūdana Saraswati in his commentary on srimad bhagavadgita (Gūḍhārtha-Dīpikā - see the older edition in case a reader does not find in the new one). He has openly said that if any vedic statement fails to stand in front of the parameters /formulas /analysis, it can be rejected and no need to treat it as a proof (pramana vakya).
This and the other verses related with the topic are not at all analyzed properly. It was done to stop the tradition of questioning and believe everything said by the scriptures. This rule goes more with foreign faiths and not with sanatan dharma /vaidic dharma / hinduism.
✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️
Reference -
Ashtadhyayi.com (first two images)
https://ashtadhyayi.com/dhatu/10.0232?tab=krut&scroll=dhatuform-1100232-%E0%A4%A3%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%8D&scrollcolor=cyan&scrolloffset=400